Talent is a measure of weight, the name is obligatory. The meaning of talent, a measure of weight in the Brockhaus and Efron encyclopedia. Sondheim appears: talent attracts talent

talentum) - a unit of mass used in ancient times in Europe, Western Asia and North Africa. In the Roman Empire, a talent corresponded to a mass of water equal in volume to one standard amphora (that is, 1 cubic Roman foot, or 26.027 liters).

Talent was the highest weight unit in the table of Greek measures (the actual word τάλαντου meant "scales"; then “cargo”). As a specific unit of weight, talent is already mentioned in Homer, and everywhere the object being weighed is gold. According to the conclusions of metrologists, the weight of the talent was equal to the weight of the Semitic shekel (sigle, shekel), namely the heavy golden Babylonian shekel, equal to 16.8 g. Homeric talents were produced in the form of oblong round bars, similar to the most ancient gold staters. In addition, in Homeric times, semi-talents weighing 8.4 g were in circulation.

In addition to the Homeric low-weight talent, in the same era a talent was known that corresponded to 3 gold staters or 6 Attic gold drachmas and weighed 26.2 g. It was first mentioned in connection with the victory of the Sicilian Greeks over the Carthaginians under Himera (480 BC. ); then among writers until the 2nd century BC. e. it serves to designate the weight measure of gold objects that were given as rewards (wreaths) or dedicated to temples. Depending on the variable designations of the drachma or mina, in relation to which the talent was a multiple (the talent was divided into 60 minas, the mina into 100 drachmas, that is, there were 6000 drachmas in the talent), the quantitative definition of the talent was very different, especially since it It was used both as a weight and as a monetary unit. The prototype of the Greek talents was the Babylonian talent, which had the shape of a bronze lion on a stand. The heavy talent weighed 60.4 kg, the light royal talent weighed half as much. The sixtieth part of a mina weighed the same as a Homeric talent (16.8 g) and was the basic smallest unit used to determine the weight of both precious metals and all weighty objects. This weight unit also served as a monetary sign, and 100 such light units (8.4 g each) or 50 heavy units constituted a heavy mine of gold. In turn, the light mine was divided into 50 units or 100 halves. 3000 of these units, heavy or light, constituted a heavy or light talent of gold. Thus, in the Babylonian system of measures, banknotes were separated from weights, with only 1/60 of a mina of weight or 1/50 of a mina of gold being common to both systems. The value of silver banknotes was determined by the ratio that was recognized in ancient times as a norm and according to which one gold coin was equal to 10 equal-size silver coins. However, due to the higher price of gold, instead of a ratio of 1:10, a ratio of 1:13 1/3 was usually found. By weight, the royal talent contained 60 royal minas, or 72 minas of gold, or 54 minas of silver. The ratio of the gold talent to the royal talent (by weight) was 5:6, the silver talent to the gold talent was 4:3, and the silver talent to the royal talent was 10:9. If we express these definitions in modern measures, it turns out that a heavy gold talent weighed 50.4 kg, a heavy silver talent weighed 67.2 kg, and light talents weighed half as much. Among other eastern (Semitic) peoples, the designations of talent were approximately the same: for example, the Phoenician talent (silver) was equal to 43.59 kg, the Jewish one weighed 44.8 kg, the Persian gold talent weighed 25.2 kg, silver - 33.65 kg, trade - 30.24 kg. The oldest system of weight measures - the Aeginetan one, the existence of which dates back to the era of Lycurgus and which was adopted in Sparta and Argos (at the beginning of the 7th century) - approaches the Babylonian system: thus, the ratio of the Aeginean stater to the Babylonian one is expressed by the ratio 27 to 25. When Solon introduced a new system of weights and banknotes; the Aegina talent remained in circulation as a trade weight measure (its actual value decreased to 36.156 kg). The silver talent (Attic or Euboean) as a monetary unit was equal to 26.196 kg. Since

Talent is a measure of weight (τάλαντον, talentum) - the highest weight unit in the table of Greek measures (the word τάλαντου actually means “scales”; then “weight”). As a specific weight unit, gold is already mentioned in Homer, and everywhere the object being weighed is gold. According to the findings of the latest metrologists, the weight of T. is equal to the weight of the Semitic shekel (sigl, shekel), namely the heavy golden Babylonian shekel, equal in weight to 16.8 g (3 gold 90.1 dollars), and at a price of 10 rubles. (gold). Homeric talents were produced in the form of oblong round bars, similar to the most ancient gold staters. In addition, in Homeric times, half-talents weighing 8.4 g were in circulation. In addition to the Homeric low-weight T., in historical times a T. was known that corresponded to 3 gold staters or 6 Attic gold drachmas and weighed 26.2 g (6 gold. 13.6 dollars). It was first mentioned about the victory of the Sicilian Greeks over the Carthaginians at Himera (480 BC); then among writers until the 2nd century. BC it serves to designate the weight measure of gold objects that were given as rewards (wreaths) or dedicated to temples. Depending on the variable designations of drachma or mina, in relation to which T. represented a multiple value (T. was divided into 60 min, mina into 100 drachmas, i.e. in T. there were 6000 drachmas), the quantitative definition of T. was very different , especially since it was used both as a weight and as a monetary unit. The prototype of the Greek T. was the Babylonian T., which had the shape of a bronze lion on a stand; the heavy T. weighed 60.4 kilos (147.5 pounds), the light royal T. - half as much (about 74 pounds). The sixtieth part of the mine weighed the same as the Homeric T. (16.8 g, or 3 gold. 90 dollars), and was the main smallest unit that served for the weight determination of both precious metals and all weighty objects. This weight unit also served as a monetary sign, and 100 such light units (8.4 g each) or 50 heavy ones constituted a heavy mine of gold; in turn, a light mine was divided into 50 units or 100 halves. 3000 of these units, heavy or light, constituted heavy or light T. gold. Thus, in the Babylonian system of measures, banknotes were separated from weights, with only 1/60 of a mina of weight or 1/50 of a mina of gold being common to both systems. The value of silver banknotes was determined by the ratio that was recognized in ancient times as a norm and according to which one gold coin was equal to 10 equal-size silver coins; however, due to the higher price of gold, instead of a ratio of 1:10, a ratio of 1:13 1/3 was usually found. By weight, the royal T. contained 60 royal minas, or 72 minas of gold, or 54 minas of silver. The ratio of T. gold to royal T. (by weight) was equal to 5:6, T. silver to T. gold 4:3, T. silver to Tsar T. - 10:9. If we express these definitions in units of modern measures, it turns out that a heavy T. of gold weighed 50.4 kilos (123.1 pounds), a heavy T. of silver - 67.2 kilos (164.1 pounds); T.'s lungs weighed half as much. The value of light T. gold would correspond to 17,577 gold metal rubles in our money, the cost of light T. silver would correspond to 1,512 rubles. (gold). Among other eastern (Semitic) peoples, the designations of T. were approximately the same: for example, the Phoenician T. (silver) was equal to 43.59 kilos (106.4 pounds) and cost 1961 rubles. (gold), the Jewish T. weighed 44.8 kilos (109.4 pounds) and cost: gold - 26,875 rubles. (gold), silver - 2016 rub. (gold); Persian T. gold weighed 25.2 kilos (61.54 pounds), silver - 33.6 kilos (82.05 pounds), trade - 30.24 kilos (73.84 pounds) and cost: gold 15,120 rubles . (gold), silver - 1512 rubles. (gold). The oldest system of weights - the Aeginaan system, the existence of which dates back to the era of Lycurgus and which was adopted in Sparta and Argos (at the beginning of the 7th century) - is close to the Babylonian system: thus, the ratio of the Aegina stater to the Babylonian one is expressed by the ratio 27 to 25. Price Ancient Aegina silver T. was 1815 rubles. (gold), later - 1032 rubles, under Solon 1615 rubles. (gold); the weight of the Aegina T. was 36.29 kilos (88.62 lbs.). When Solon introduced a new system of weights and banknotes, the Aegina T. remained in circulation as a trade weight measure (its actual value decreased to 36.156 kilos - 88.3 pounds); The silver t. (Attic or Euboean) as a monetary unit was equated to 26.196 kilos (63.97 pounds) and cost 1,125 rubles. (gold). Since the time of Alexander the Great, the weight of the Attic talent was 25,902 kilos (63.3 lbs.). Wed. Hussey, "Essay on the ancient weights and money, and the Roman and Greek liquid measures" (Oxford, 1836); Boeckh, “Metrologische Untersuchungen über Gewichte, Mü nzfüsse und Masse des Altertums in ihrem Zusammenhange” (B., 1838); Brandis, “Das M ü nz-Mass und Gewichtswesen in Vorderasien bis auf Alexander den Grossen” (B., 1866); Lenormant, "La monnaie dans l"antiquit é" (P., 1878-79); F. Hultsch, "Griechi sche und Rö mische Metrologie" (B., 1882); Wex, "Metrologie Grecque et Romaine" (P. , 1886). The remains of the metrological literature of antiquity are collected and commented by Hultsch in his publication: "Metrologicorum Scriptorum reliquiae" (Lpc. , 1864, 1866).
. ABOUT.

Encyclopedic Dictionary F.A. Brockhaus and I.A. Efron. - S.-Pb.: Brockhaus-Efron. 1890-1907 .

See what “Talent is a measure of weight” in other dictionaries:

    - (τάλαντον, talentum) the highest weight unit in the table of Greek measures (the word τάλαντου actually means scales; then load). As a specific weight unit, gold is already mentioned in Homer, and everywhere the object being weighed is gold. By … Encyclopedic Dictionary F.A. Brockhaus and I.A. Ephron

    Contents 1 Units of measurement of mass 1.1 The metric system 1.2 Measures of mass in science ... Wikipedia

    - (Latin talentum, from Greek actually scales). 1) a certain amount of money among the ancient Jews, as well as weight = approx. 3 poods. 2) weight of silver among the Greeks = approx. 1.5 pounds. 3) weight in Greece and the Ionian. spicy = 100 English lb. 4) talent, ability to do what... ... Dictionary of foreign words of the Russian language

    Talanta, m. [Greek. talenton, lit. weight, scales]. 1. units only Talent, giftedness, outstanding natural abilities. “Your art, your talent was honored with an equal tribute.” Nekrasov. || more often plural In general, the ability to do something, the ability to do something. do… … Ushakov's Explanatory Dictionary

    talent- a, m. 1) Outstanding innate qualities, abilities, high degree of talent. Musician's talent. Acting talent. Poetic talent. He clearly saw that all this impetuosity, fever and impatience is nothing more than... ... Popular dictionary of the Russian language

    Talent- during the earthly life of Jesus Christ, talent was equal to 1.29 Russian royal rubles. In the New Testament, it is mentioned as a monetary unit only once: in the Savior’s parable of the talents (Gospel of Matthew, 25, 14–30). In other cases… … Orthodox Encyclopedia

    I talent I, b. p.a measure of weight, New. head, Matt. 25, 15 et seq. (in Leskov and others), Russian. Tslav., st. glory talent τάλαντον (Zogr., Mar., Ostrom.). From Greek τάλαντον scales; monetary unit of account from ταλαντ carrier; see Vasmer, Gr. sl. this.… … Etymological Dictionary of the Russian Language by Max Vasmer

    talent (1)- (Greek monetary unit). Borrowing from Art. sl. language, where the talent is Greek. talanton “monetary unit” “measure of weight” (gold, silver) “scales” (from talanteuō “shaking, shaking” “weighing”). Wed. Gospel parable about the one buried in the ground... ... Etymological Dictionary of the Russian Language

    Tal'ant was a monetary unit and measure of weight in ancient times, equal to 3000 shekels (36 kg) (Ex. 38:25 26) (cf. 2 Kings 5:23). In some places, it is obviously used figuratively (2 Samuel 12:30; Rev. 16:21). This word is only thanks to the parable of the Savior... ... Bible. Old and New Testaments. Synodal translation. Biblical encyclopedia arch. Nikifor.

    talent- Greek – talanton (monetary unit, “scales”, “bearer”). In Rus', the word was used in Church Slavonic and Old Slavonic languages ​​in the meaning of “measure of weight” from the 11th–12th centuries. Along with this meaning, the word was also used in a figurative sense - ... ... Etymological Dictionary of the Russian Language Semenov

Questions

1. What quantity did the ancient Egyptians measure in parasangs?

ANSWER: The ancient Egyptians measured in parasangs distance, path length.

Farsakh (parasang, parasang, farsang, farsag, sang, tash, yigach, Persian mile)

(Greek παρασγγης) - Persian measure of length; usually the distance that

the caravan passes until the next rest, halt, or, in other words, the distance,

which can be walked on foot in an hour.

There are:

Persian Farsakh = 5549 m.

Ancient Egyptian farsakh (parasang) = 1/9 shema = 6980 m.

Central Asian Farsakh (sang). In the 19th century, usually 8 versts = 8534.25 m.

(Source: Wikipedia)

PARASANG (Greek, from Persian farsang) a travel measure in Persia,

Persian mile = 5 versts = 6.98 km.

(Source: "Dictionary of foreign words included in the Russian language.", 1910)

PARASANG (Greek parasanges, from Persian farsang.) Persian mile, equal to 4.66 versts.

(Source: “Explanation of 25,000 foreign words that have come into use in the Russian language, with the meaning of their roots.”, 1865)

2. What physical quantity can be measured in furlongs?

ANSWER: Measured in furlongs, or furlongs distance.

Furlong (Old English furh - furrow, rut + Old English lang - long) is a British and American unit of distance measurement. The term comes from the phrase “long furrow”; A furlong was the standard furrow length on a 10-acre square field in the Middle Ages.

1 furlong = 1/8 mile = 10 chains = 220 yards = 40 rods = 660 feet = 1000 links. 5 furlongs are approximately equal to 1 kilometer (1.0058 km)


Currently, the furlong, as a unit of distance measurement, is used in horse racing in the UK, Ireland and the USA.

3. What unit is the bushel? Is the bushel the same in the UK and the US?

ANSWER: Bushel - unit of volume, used in the English system of measures. Used for measuring the volume of bulk goods, mainly agricultural, but not for liquids. Abbreviated as bsh. or bu.

Bushels in the UK and US are not the same.

In the British Imperial system of measures for bulk solids: 1 bushel = 4 pecks = 8 gallons = 32 dry quarts = 64 dry pints = 1.032 US bushels = 2219.36 cubic inches = 36.36872 liters (dm³).

In the American system of measures for bulk solids: 1 bushel = 0.9689 English bushels = 35.2393 l; according to other sources: 1 bushel = 35, l = 9, US gallons.

4. What value was measured in talents in ancient Greece? What is 1 talent equal to in modern units? Were talents equal in Greece and Rome?

ANSWER:

Talent (Greek τάλαντον, lat. talentum) is a unit of mass used in ancient times in Europe, Western Asia and North Africa. In Ancient Babylon for unit of mass was taken talent - the mass of water filling such a vessel from which water flows uniformly through an opening of a certain size within one hour.

In the Roman Empire, a talent corresponded to a mass of water equal in volume to one standard amphora (that is, 1 cubic Roman foot, or 26.027 liters).

Talent was the highest unit of weight in the table of Greek measures (the word τάλαντου actually meant “scales”; then “weight”).

Talent (Greek talanton, talentum - lit. weight, scales) is the largest weight (mass) and monetary unit of ancient Greece, Egypt, Babylon, Persia and a number of regions of Asia Minor.

Talent in Mesopotamia

Talent as a measure of weight and a term appeared during the development of exchange in Mesopotamia, apparently back in the 4th millennium BC. e. or even earlier. The etymology of the word is unknown, but probably “talent” simply meant “weight.” Appearance in Sumer at the end of the 4th millennium BC. e. writing, demanded by the needs of economic life, led to the development of applied scientific knowledge, primarily astronomy and mathematics, based on the 60-digit number system. At the same time, the metric system of measures and weights was developed. 1 talent was divided into 60 minas, and 1 mina into 60 shekels.

Talent in Ancient Greece

Apparently, talent as a term and calculation-weight category was borrowed by the Greeks in Syria - Phenicia from the Semitic peoples when contacts with the countries of the Middle East were renewed in the 10th - 9th centuries. BC e.. In the texts of the Mycenaean era (XV - XIII centuries BC) the term talent is not attested: from the tablets of Knossos and Mycenae the word ta-to-mo is known, meaning “weight” (usually identified with the Greek word σταθμός, “ stathmos"). For the first time, talent as a fixed weight is found in Homer, always denoting weight in gold, although its mass and, accordingly, cost were not particularly large in this era.


The name of the weight and the coins were the same - apparently because the originally minted coin contained as much metal (silver or copper) as its weight name indicated. All coins since the time of Solon (594 BC) have been silver, since gold and copper were used very little before the era of Alexander the Great. Talent and mina were not monetary units, but calculation units: talent was the name of the amount of 100 mina or 6000 drachmas, and mina was the name of the amount of 60 drachmas. Monetary units gradually fell in value, in particular due to the “deterioration of the coin.” It is believed that under Alexander and after his death the value of talent dropped significantly.

Attic (Eubean) standard of the 6th century. BC e - III century. n. e.:

1 talent (weight) = 60 min = 6000 drachmas (weight) = 24.47 kg

Talent in Ancient Rome

The Romans correlated the Attic talent with a mass of 100 pounds (100 librae). Since 1 Roman pound was 3/4 of a Greek mina, then the Roman talent was equal to 1.25 Attic talents.

5. What measurements is the “liver” intended for? How is it structured and graded?

ANSWER:

LIVER - (Siphon) a device for transfusing small quantities of liquid, operating on the principle of a siphon. A vessel in the form of a tube open on both sides with an extension in the middle for pouring a small amount of liquid, for taking samples of smth. and so on.

It was used in the navy for pouring vodka from barrels or anchors into the valley. Samoilov dictionary. M.L.: State Naval Publishing House of the NKVMF of the USSR, 1941.

To take a sample of a liquid, you need to lower the liver into a vessel with this liquid. The liquid will rise through the liver tube, since it is a communicating vessel with a larger vessel. Then we tightly close the upper hole of the liver with our finger so that the liquid in the liver is not affected by atmospheric pressure from above, and the liquid does not flow out of the liver. In order for the liquid to flow from the liver, you need to remove your finger from the top hole, and the liquid, under the influence of gravity, will flow out of the device into the desired container.

There is no scale on the liver; it is not graduated. Although it can be calibrated in units of volume, for example, in milliliters, in order to know what volume of liquid is in the liver.

(τάλαντον, talentum) - the highest weight unit in the table of Greek measures (the word τάλαντου actually means “scales”; then “load”). As a specific weight unit, gold is already mentioned in Homer, and everywhere the object being weighed is gold. According to the findings of the latest metrologists, the weight of T. is equal to the weight of the Semitic shekel (sigl, shekel), namely the heavy golden Babylonian shekel, equal in weight to 16.8 g (3 gold 90.1 dollars), and at a price of 10 rubles. (gold). Homeric talents were produced in the form of oblong round bars, similar to the most ancient gold staters. In addition, in Homeric times, half-talents weighing 8.4 g were in circulation. In addition to the Homeric low-weight T., in historical times there was known T., corresponding to 3 gold staters or 6 Attic gold drachmas and weighing 26.2 g (6 gold. 13.6 dollars). It was first mentioned about the victory of the Sicilian Greeks over the Carthaginians at Himera (480 BC); then among writers until the 2nd century. BC it serves to designate the weight measure of gold objects that were given as rewards (wreaths) or dedicated to temples. Depending on the variable designations of drachma or mina, in relation to which T. represented a multiple value (T. was divided into 60 min, mina into 100 drachmas, i.e. in T. there were 6000 drachmas), the quantitative definition of T. was very different , especially since it was used both as a weight and as a monetary unit. The prototype of the Greek T. was the Babylonian T., which had the shape of a bronze lion on a stand; the heavy T. weighed 60.4 kilos (147.5 pounds), the light royal T. - half as much (about 74 pounds). The sixtieth part of the mine weighed the same as the Homeric T. (16.8 g, or 3 gold. 90 dollars), and was the smallest basic unit that served for the weight determination of both precious metals and all weighty objects. This weight unit also served as a monetary sign, and 100 such light units (8.4 g each) or 50 heavy ones constituted a heavy mine of gold; in turn, a light mine was divided into 50 units or 100 halves. 3000 of these units, heavy or light, constituted heavy or light T. gold. Thus, in the Babylonian system of measures, banknotes were separated from weights, with only 1/60 of a mina of weight or 1/50 of a mina of gold being common to both systems. The value of silver banknotes was determined by the ratio that was recognized in ancient times as a norm and according to which one gold coin was equal to 10 equal-size silver coins; however, due to the higher price of gold, instead of a ratio of 1:10, a ratio of 1:13 1/3 was usually found. By weight, the royal T. contained 60 royal minas, or 72 minas of gold, or 54 minas of silver. The ratio of T. gold to royal T. (by weight) was equal to 5:6, T. silver to T. gold 4:3, T. silver to Tsar T. - 10:9. If we express these definitions in units of modern measures, it turns out that a heavy T. of gold weighed 50.4 kilos (123.1 pounds), a heavy T. of silver - 67.2 kilos (164.1 pounds); T.'s lungs weighed half as much. The value of light T. gold would correspond to 17,577 gold metal rubles in our money, the cost of light T. silver would correspond to 1,512 rubles. (gold). Among other eastern (Semitic) peoples, the designations of T. were approximately the same: for example, the Phoenician T. (silver) was equal to 43.59 kilos (106.4 pounds) and cost 1961 rubles. (gold), the Jewish T. weighed 44.8 kilos (109.4 pounds) and cost: gold - 26,875 rubles. (gold), silver - 2016 rub. (gold); Persian T. gold weighed 25.2 kilos (61.54 pounds), silver - 33.6 kilos (82.05 pounds), trade - 30.24 kilos (73.84 pounds) and cost: gold 15,120 rubles . (gold), silver - 1512 rubles. (gold). The oldest system of weights - the Aeginaan system, the existence of which dates back to the era of Lycurgus and which was adopted in Sparta and Argos (at the beginning of the 7th century) - is close to the Babylonian system: thus, the ratio of the Aegina stater to the Babylonian one is expressed by the ratio 27 to 25. Price Ancient Aegina silver T. was 1815 rubles. (gold), later - 1032 rubles, under Solon 1615 rubles. (gold); the weight of the Aegina T. was 36.29 kilos (88.62 lbs.). When Solon introduced a new system of weights and banknotes, the Aegina T. remained in circulation as a trade weight measure (its actual value decreased to 36.156 kilos - 88.3 pounds); The silver t. (Attic or Euboean) as a monetary unit was equated to 26.196 kilos (63.97 pounds) and cost 1,125 rubles. (gold). Since the time of Alexander the Great, the weight of the Attic talent was 25,902 kilos (63.3 lbs.). Wed. Hussey, "Essay on the ancient weights and money, and the Roman and Greek liquid measures" (Oxford, 1836); Boeckh, “Metrologische Untersuchungen über Gewichte, Mü nzfüsse und Masse des Altertums in ihrem Zusammenhange” (B., 1838); Brandis, “Das M ü nz-Mass und Gewichtswesen in Vorderasien bis auf Alexander den Grossen” (B., 1866); Lenormant, "La monnaie dans l"antiquit é" (P., 1878-79); F. Hultsch, "Griechi sche und Rö mische Metrologie" (B., 1882); Wex, "Metrologie Grecque et Romaine" (P. , 1886). The remains of the metrological literature of antiquity are collected and commented by Hultsch in his publication: "Metrologicorum Scriptorum reliquiae" (Lpc. , 1864, 1866).
. ABOUT.

  • - an ancient weight in Germany and Holland, one of the smallest parts of the pound and mark, previously used to determine the weight of coins and weights...

    Encyclopedic Dictionary of Brockhaus and Euphron

  • Encyclopedic Dictionary of Brockhaus and Euphron

  • - an ancient Asian weight unit, approved by the Russian tsars for use in foreign areas of Russia...

    Encyclopedic Dictionary of Brockhaus and Euphron

  • Encyclopedic Dictionary of Brockhaus and Euphron

  • - one of the divisions of the Roman ace: ace was divided into 12 ounces, 8/12 aces were called B. - probably an abbreviation of bis triens = 2/3...

    Encyclopedic Dictionary of Brockhaus and Euphron

  • Encyclopedic Dictionary of Brockhaus and Euphron

  • - English unit of weight = 120 kg; also used in the sense of a bale of cotton or generally a sack, bag...

    Encyclopedic Dictionary of Brockhaus and Euphron

  • - medical weight of the former German system = 62.2...

    Encyclopedic Dictionary of Brockhaus and Euphron

  • - cm....

    Encyclopedic Dictionary of Brockhaus and Euphron

  • - a large unit of weight in the East Indies, divided into 20 mounds. The size of the mound is also shown in English. lb. Avoirdupois = 453.592 gr. Ordinary, or Bombay, K. is equal to 560 English. bidding...

    Encyclopedic Dictionary of Brockhaus and Euphron

  • - cm....

    Encyclopedic Dictionary of Brockhaus and Euphron

  • - cm....

    Encyclopedic Dictionary of Brockhaus and Euphron

  • - the former Turkish unit of weight, divided into 400 dirhems; see also Kantar...

    Encyclopedic Dictionary of Brockhaus and Euphron

  • - the highest weight unit in the table of Greek measures. As a specific weight unit, gold is already mentioned in Homer, and everywhere the object being weighed is gold...

    Encyclopedic Dictionary of Brockhaus and Euphron

  • - Zolotnik, an old Russian unit of weight equal to 4.266 g or 1/96 lb. Title "Z." comes from the word “gold”, because back in the 10th century. in Kievan Rus Z. was a gold coin...

    Great Soviet Encyclopedia

"Talent is a measure of weight" in books

Measure

From the book Squiggles Volume 1 author Mamonov Pyotr Nikolaevich

Measure Do not stay where you are not. “There is no price for moderate and difficult work.” Father Isaac

Measure

From the book Book of Theorems 2 author Lensky Vasily Vasilievich

Measure The measure of the beautiful is the ugly. The measure of the cultural is lack of culture. The measure of the creative is pathology. Within the limits of the measure - vitality. Any type of artificial influence on a person within the limits of the measure is vital. Art into pathology

S. Measure.

From the book Encyclopedia of Philosophical Sciences. Part one. Logics author Hegel Georg Wilhelm Friedrich

S. Measure. § 107. Measure is a qualitatively determined quantity, first of all, as immediate; it is a certain quantity with which a certain existence or a certain quality is associated. (185) Addition. Measure, as the unity of quality and quantity, is, therefore,

4. Measure

author Losev Alexey Fedorovich

4. Measure Let us note first of all that Plato criticizes the Protagoras doctrine of the subjective human understanding of measure (Theaet. 152a, 161c, e, 168d, 178b, 179b, 183b). In contrast to this, Plato understands his term “measure”, of course, as a property of objective being, when subjective

4. Measure

From the book Results of Millennial Development, book. I-II author Losev Alexey Fedorovich

4. Measure In the terminology of measure, Aristotle, as elsewhere, differs from Plato in two respects. Namely, strictly distinguishing idea and matter, Aristotle mainly proceeds from their obligatory identity. And besides, Aristotle understands this kind of identity as actively

Charter of Henry VIII "For the restoration of the office of Keeper of Standards of Weight and Measures of Weight in the Corporation of London, April 13, 1531 A.D."

From the book Underrated Events of History. Book of Historical Misconceptions by Stomma Ludwig

Charter of Henry VIII “On the restoration of the office of Keeper of Standards of Weight and Measures of Weight in the Corporation of London on April 13, 1531 from the Birth of Our Lord” Henry VIII, by the grace of God, King of England and France, Defender of the Faith, Lord of Ireland, to all to whom this charter will be

Spool (weight measure)

From the book Great Soviet Encyclopedia (ZO) by the author TSB

Chapter five. Talent! Talent!

From the book Universal Reader. 4th grade author Team of authors

Chapter five. Talent! Talent! A month passed. Kashtanka was already accustomed to being fed a delicious dinner every evening and being called Auntie. She got used to both the stranger and her new roommates. Life flowed like clockwork. All days started the same. Usually before everyone else

Sondheim appears: talent attracts talent

From the book Virtuoso Teams. Teams that changed the world by Andy Boynton

Enter Sondheim: talent attracts talent As we noted, the team needed a librettist, and soon it was replenished with the young protégé of the great composer Oscar Hammerstein, Stephen Sondheim. Hammerstein taught him to strive

Talent attracts talent

From the book Steve Jobs. Leadership Lessons author Simon William L

Talent attracts talent One of the most amazing things about finding talented people is that they become your best recruiters. These are exactly the same people with the same sense of style, sharing the same values. A good "pirate"

From the book “About the Current Moment” No. 3(75), 2008. author USSR Internal Predictor

Measure of understanding and institutions of power in society 1. Measure of understanding: what is it? development and options; evaluation criteria The phrase “everyone, to the extent of his understanding, works not for himself, but, to the extent of misunderstanding, for those who understand more” - has become part of the commonly used set of “stamped

Talent is talent in everything!

From the book Literary Newspaper 6376 (No. 24 2012) author Literary Newspaper

Talent is talent in everything! Talent is talent in everything! NAME FROM THE POSTER I first met Natalya Savchenko, an actress of the Tula Drama Theater, back in 1995, when I saw her on stage in the play “Wolves and Sheep.” I generally love the classics, but here I saw him in the role

Measure for measure Measure for measure Valentin Kurbatov 02/13/2013

From the book Newspaper Tomorrow 950 (7 2013) author Zavtra Newspaper

From the book Ascetic Words by Sirin Isaac

Word 84. About how great is the measure of knowledge and the measure of faith. There is knowledge that precedes faith, and there is knowledge generated by faith. The knowledge that precedes faith is natural knowledge, and the knowledge generated by faith is spiritual knowledge. There is natural knowledge that discerns good

Word 84. About how great is the measure of knowledge and the measure of faith

From the book Works by Sirin Isaac

Word 84. About how great is the measure of knowledge and the measure of faith. There is knowledge that precedes faith, and there is knowledge generated by faith. The knowledge that precedes faith is natural knowledge, and the knowledge generated by faith is spiritual knowledge. There is natural knowledge that discerns good

In ancient times in Europe, Western Asia and North Africa, it was used as a monetary unit and unit of mass. talent. Its etymology: goes back to Proto-Indo-European * tel-, * tol-, which means carry , according to ancient Greek. τάλαντον , in Lat. talentum.

In Ancient Greece talent was the highest weight unit in the table of measures, and the word τάλαντον meant scales ; then cargo . Talent is already mentioned in Homer, and everywhere the weighed object is gold. Homeric talents were in the form of oblong round bars, similar to the most ancient gold staters. Metrologists believe that the mass of the talent was equal to the mass of the Semitic shekel (sigil, shekel), namely the heavy golden Babylonian shekel, equal to 16.8 kg. Also in Homeric times, semi-talents weighing 8.4 kg were in circulation.

In the Homeric era, a talent was also known that corresponded to 3 gold staters or 6 Attic gold drachmas and weighed 26.2 kg. There is a mention of him in 480 BC. e. in connection with the victory of the Sicilian Greeks over the Carthaginians at Himmer, then among writers until the 2nd century BC. e. they denoted the weight measure of gold objects that were given as rewards (wreaths) or dedicated to temples.

There were 60 minas in 1 talent, 1 mina = 100 drachmas, i.e. 1 talent = 6000 drachmas. Depending on the variable designations of drachma or mina, the quantitative definition of talent was very different.

Babylonian talent, which had the shape of a bronze lion on a stand, was the prototype of Greek talents. Heavy talent weighed 60.4 kg, easy royal talent- half as much. The sixtieth part of a mina weighed 16.8 kg (the same as a Homeric talent), and was the basic smallest unit that served to determine the weight of both noble metals and all weighty objects.

Babylonian talent was also a monetary sign, and 100 such light units (8.4 kg each) or 50 heavy ones made up a heavy gold mine. In turn, the light mine was divided into 50 units or 100 halves. 3000 of these units, heavy or light, constituted a heavy or light talent of gold. Thus, in the Babylonian system of measures, banknotes were separated from weights, with only 1/60 of a mina of weight or 1/50 of a mina of gold being common to both systems.

In ancient times, one gold coin was equal to 10 equivalent silver coins, but due to the higher price of gold, instead of a ratio of 1:10, a ratio of 1:13 1/3 was usually found.

By weight 1 royal talent= 60 royal minas, or 72 minas of gold, or 54 minas of silver. The ratio of the gold talent to the royal talent (by weight) was 5:6, the silver talent to the gold talent was 4:3, and the silver talent to the royal talent was 10:9.

In modern measures, a heavy gold talent weighed 50.4 kg, a heavy silver talent weighed 67.2 kg, and light talents weighed half as much.

1 Phoenician talent(silver) = 43.59 kg, 1 Jewish talent= 44.8 kg, 1 Persian talent gold = 25.2 kg, silver - 33.65 kg, trade - 30.24 kg.

The existence of the Aegina system, the oldest system of weights, dates back to the era of Lycurgus. It was adopted in Sparta and Argos at the beginning of the 7th century. Attitude 1 Aegina stater to Babylonian is expressed by the ratio of 27 to 25. When Solon in 594 BC. e. introduced a new system of weights and banknotes, the Aegina talent remained in circulation as a trade weight measure (its actual value decreased to 36.156 kg). 1 silver talent(Attic or Euboean) as a monetary unit was equivalent to 26.196 kg. Since the time of Alexander the Great, the weight of the Attic talent was 25.902 kg of silver. 1 talent = 60 mina, 1 mina = 100 drachmas (the drachma was a real settlement coin of that time).

1 small talent Ptolemy = 60 small Ptolemaic minas = 20.47 kg.

1 great talent Ptolemy = 60 large Ptolemaic min.

1 Carthaginian talent= 60 min = 27 kg = 60 shekels.

Ancient Greek amphora. The volume of talent was equal to one standard amphora filled with water

In the Roman Empire, a talent corresponded to a mass of water equal in volume to one standard amphora (that is, 1 cubic Roman foot, or 26.027 liters).

In the New Testament, Jesus Christ told a parable about a master who gave his three slaves one coin called a talent. One hid his talent in the ground - he buried it, the second exchanged it, and the third multiplied it threefold. From here the identity of talent with the gift of God spread in Christianity.